Andreessen talks concerning the proposal as if it had been Putin himself invading Atherton, California, the elite zip code the place he resided till not too long ago. If this tax is imposed, he says, buyers will exit the market and improvements gained’t be funded. “Primary, you kill startups and enterprise capital. So congratulations, you kill the know-how trade, basically,” he says. “Quantity two, you kill the California tax base—California is finished!”
However the carnage doesn’t cease there, says Andreessen. As soon as the federal government will get a style of this new tax on the wealthy, it is going to need extra, extra, extra, till ultimately this endangered class of rich buyers will likely be sucked dry. Then the federal government will go after the wealth of people that aren’t tremendous wealthy however merely very wealthy. Eventually, we’ll all be paying wealth taxes! “Presto, chango, we’re Argentina!” says Horowitz, with Andreessen shortly seconding this doom situation.
Earlier than we cue up the soundtrack to Evita, let’s again up a minute. There’s no proof {that a} tax on unrealized features would finish enterprise capital. If Andreessen and Horowitz packed it in for tax functions, others would leap on the likelihood to play the profitable startup lottery—even when, god forbid, they needed to pay some taxes pre-IPO on spectacular features.
However there’s additionally little motive to suppose this tax will occur in any respect. The Biden proposal is simply that—a proposal. Altering the tax code requires Congressional motion. On the very least Congress would handle a few of the cheap objections that Andreessen raises, like the chance that an investor acquire may be measured in a short lived peak of an organization’s valuation. However it’s more likely that Congress will reject this, even when the general public desires to see the very rich pay their due. Think about the completely indefensible carried curiosity loophole, which permits fat-cat hedge fund and personal fairness executives to flee taxes. Regardless of near-universal settlement that this can be a complete rip-off—even Invoice Ackman referred to as it “a stain on the tax code”—and Biden’s vow to remove it, it’s nonetheless with us. The concept a brand-new wealth tax desperately opposed by the nation’s largest political donors will get by way of a divided Congress is a hallucination that even ChatGPT wouldn’t suggest.
Andreessen and Horowitz are good sufficient to know this, so their objections come off as each paranoid and self-interested. However I believe there’s one thing extra occurring, a component that’s typically cited to clarify why some Silicon Valley individuals have turned to Trump: They resent how the media, a few of the “woke” inhabitants, and left-leaning politicians don’t recognize them, and even vilify them. In Trumpland, their wealth and the knowledge supposedly related to it’s revered.
To his credit score, Andreessen expresses this grievance out loud. He fondly seems again to the times when Democrats catered to his cohort. “They had been pro-tech, they had been pro-startup,” he says. “You may make some huge cash, and you then give the cash away in philanthropy, and also you get huge credit score for that. And it absolves you of, no matter.” He was on that path himself, he says, till critics turned on billionaires who had been making a gift of their cash. His eyes opened when he noticed what occurred after Mark Zuckerberg introduced his intent to present away nearly all his cash to his basis; individuals thought he was doing it for himself, to spice up his firm’s popularity. What’s the purpose of giving all that cash away, Andreessen appears to be saying, in the event you aren’t celebrated for it? (Um, to do good? To pay society again for all that cash you made and paid minimal taxes on?)